Видео

❤❤

Why sensor the word abuse?

I feel I'm in a test poverty white ppl town

Pain means something is wrong

I'm at 2:37. My initial thought was to split them into groups to find it faster too. My think about it for a while idea is that if you had a large enough flat surface, you could line up all the rolls length wise, then push a bar of some kind forward so it hits all 50 rolls at once. The lighter roll should roll further than the heavier rolls, but I don't know if that would hold up considering there is angular momentum and friction involved. Let's see your idea! I'm excited, even if this is an old video.

"Victimless crime" I was about to talk about how absurd it is to charge someone for a victimless crime. But then my brain took over the reins and applied reason and logic. Is there ever a victimless crime? And i always take things a step too far and thought... Is there ever a victimless anything? Every breath you take reduces the usable oxygen level in your surroundings. The CO2 you breathe out is someone else's burden. The statement "a waste of oxygen" is very much a true statement sometimes. Some people aren't worth the oxygen they consume. And it only gets worse from there, the food you ate today could have been shared with someone that is starving. The fuel you burned to watch this video could have saved someone's life on the other side of the globe. The words you uttered at some point can be the tipping point in a chain of events that cause world war 3 to break out tomorrow. There are no victimless crime, there are no victimless anything. Everything we do has an effect on the world we occupy with every other being.

I made 2 random number generators play this, the 1st one won

The tankies think this is fake news

And jesus christ what the hell is wrong with the foster care system!?

Might be the reason why Canada got rid of the penny, eh?

BetterHelp is awful.

I will leave this for those who remember it in that year that it happened, at exactly 15:52 the song Turncoat was used. You know what it was used for.

"Не у всех есть 240 герц монитор, наверное". У половины даже 144 нет

hmmmm, me getting a 16 on the PCL-r

They generally use these algorithms to decide who to investigate if they don’t know they generally don’t use it as evidence

I swear I've never wanted or searched for this. The algorithms knows I've watched the boys season 4 so according to that I might be interested.

The problem doesn't make sense because the rope is not actually stretching at 10 cm/second if it stops stretching for the second the ant is walking the 5cm. The movement would have to be continuous and simultaneous fort the problem to make sense, then it still requires clarification of the ant's velocity. Is the ant's velocity relative to the table or the rope?

Not to dismiss what this man did / went through, but he only scientifically proved what was already ancient knowledge. This would not have been happening to Jewish Doctors that were practicing the law. Lev 15:19-23 and Lev 21:11 would have prevented them from mixing the “clean” with the “unclean”. Both for the dea-d and “woman with a disch-rge.”

So many Nikolai's I can't keep up lol

Is it just me or the diagonals you drew on the boards after 3x3 did not correspond to any actual diagonals on the board. You weren't moving from one square to an adjacent diagonal

Is it just me or the diagonals you drew on the boards after 3x3 did not correspond to any actual diagonals on the board. You weren't moving from one square to an adjacent diagonal

i wish pain was pain but it didn’t hurt, like you still feel pain but you don’t feel hurt.

Moment

Those blue things on the shelf are not bread but a biohazard lol

Was on 4 lol

I feel like this topic is big for also deciding what mental illness/disabilities one has as well- what balance to strike between professional opinion and self diagnosis through ones own experiences.

The answer is yes.

you watched episode 4 of the boys

That was extremely interesting well executed

the world is slowly turning into minority report lol

Father: No one will understand Yeah good luck use that excuse in hell.

And my immediate reaction to the introduction of this episode was, I don't believe you, DO IT AGAIN!!

Gamers don't die, they respawn

Better help sells customer medical data & doesn't use licensed professionals ffs

All is not 50/50?

I once dropped a bar of soap and it landed on its corner.

PLease recognize that the word 'psychopath' is NOT a term of psychology, it is a term of criminology; it has no scientifically recognized definition. ;)

>This will make you question modern medicine No need, I was alive in 2020.

Test

3:14 Yoda Has A Mental Breakdown.

Here after the boys

DaVinci decidedly did not invent the parachute or helicopter. He may have conceptualized them, but could not produce adequately-performing examples. If we just use drawings and descriptions as criteria, then there are any number of schoolchildren who have invented flying cars and battle-worthy mecha.

The world failed that little girl.. it's crazy to me how many kids are pulled out of abusive situations only to be put in foster care to be abused again. How can we let this happen again and again?

Your own research goes against your conclusion. You say she was abused by scientists but the scientists she was placed in the care of initially sound very nurturing and caring. It wasn't until she spent time in foster care and private hospitals that resumed abuse caused her to regress.

Finally o got the answer to this

i tried explaining this paradox to a guy in pony town and he didn't take me serious. that rlly traumatized me for some reason

So Victor just chose the way where those things doesn't really matter *that* much to him? Kind of not giving a f...

That is probably the most disturbing video I've ever seen on RUclips wtf

Pi is 3.1415 not 3.1416

Probabilistic measures, if compiled correctly, may be an evidence, as is with DNA tests, but definitely not a proof. There are several points, why this was not correctly compiled, which would have been obvious to a statistician. Not only with the dubious numbers, but at first with the underlying model. Hence, this example is not even an evidence.